PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 79, No. 1, January 1999, pp. 50-65

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Di Fabio, R. P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Di Fabio, R. P

Professional Perspectives

Manipulation of the Cervical Spine: Risks and Benefits

Richard P Di Fabio

RP Di Fabio, PhD, PT, is Professor, Program in Physical Therapy, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Minnesota, UMHC Box 388, Minneapolis, MN 55455 (USA) (difab001{at}maroon.tc.umn.edu)

Manipulation of the cervical spine (MCS) is used in the treatment of people with neck pain and muscle-tension headache. The purposes of this article are to review previously reported cases in which injuries were attributed to MCS, to identify cases of injury involving treatment by physical therapists, and to describe the risks and benefits of MCS. One hundred seventy-seven published cases of injury reported in 116 articles were reviewed. The cases were published between 1925 and 1997. The most frequently reported injuries involved arterial dissection or spasm, and lesions of the brain stem. Death occurred in 32 (18%) of the cases. Physical therapists were involved in less than 2% of the cases, and no deaths have been attributed to MCS provided by physical therapists. Although the risk of injury associated with MCS appears to be small, this type of therapy has the potential to expose patients to vertebral artery damage that can be avoided with the use of mobilization (nonthrust passive movements). The literature does not demonstrate that the benefits of MCS outweigh the risks. Several recommendations for future studies and for the practice of MCS are discussed.

Key Words: Effectiveness • Physical therapy • Risk • Spinal manipulation • Vertebrobasilar accident




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
J. A Cleland, J. D Childs, J. M Fritz, J. M Whitman, and S. L Eberhart
Development of a Clinical Prediction Rule for Guiding Treatment of a Subgroup of Patients With Neck Pain: Use of Thoracic Spine Manipulation, Exercise, and Patient Education
Physical Therapy, January 1, 2007; 87(1): 9 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
R. R Richter and M. F Reinking
How does evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of the vertebral artery test influence teaching of the test in a professional physical therapist education program?
Physical Therapy, June 1, 2005; 85(6): 589 - 599.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
J. M Fritz, J. M Whitman, T. W Flynn, R. S Wainner, and J. D Childs
Factors Related to the Inability of Individuals With Low Back Pain to Improve With a Spinal Manipulation
Physical Therapy, February 1, 2004; 84(2): 173 - 190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. L. Hoving, B. W. Koes, H. C.W. de Vet, D. A.W.M. van der Windt, W. J.J. Assendelft, H. van Mameren, W. L.J.M. Deville, J. J.M. Pool, R. J.P.M Scholten, and L. M. Bouter
Manual Therapy, Physical Therapy, or Continued Care by a General Practitioner for Patients with Neck Pain: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Ann Intern Med, May 21, 2002; 136(10): 713 - 722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
T. W Flynn, J. Fritz, R. S Wainner, J. Whitman, G. D. Deyle, N. E Henderson, M. B Garber, R. L Matekel, M. G Ryder, S. C Allison, et al.
On the Philadelphia Panel Articles
Physical Therapy, March 1, 2002; 82(3): 286 - 292.
[Full Text]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
C. M Davis, J. M Rothstein, A. Delitto, and The Philadelphia Panel
More Questions Than Answers
Physical Therapy, March 1, 2002; 82(3): 289 - 292.
[Full Text]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
E. Ernst and M. H. Cohen
Informed Consent in Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Arch Intern Med, October 22, 2001; 161(19): 2288 - 2292.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
E Ernst
Does spinal manipulation have specific treatment effects?
Fam. Pract., December 1, 2000; 17(6): 554 - 556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
J. M Furman and S. L Whitney
Central Causes of Dizziness
Physical Therapy, February 1, 2000; 80(2): 179 - 187.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
L. Padua, R. Padua, I. Aprile, and P. Tonali
Methods of Literature Review
Physical Therapy, November 1, 1999; 79(11): 1088 - 1088.
[Full Text]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
R. Branson and R. P Di Fabio
Causes of Injury From Cervical Manipulation
Physical Therapy, May 1, 1999; 79(5): 514 - 516.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Physical Therapy Association.